G Algonquin Trips and Other Things: November 2007 Algonquin canoe and portage trips

Monday, November 19, 2007

Okay, so it's ironic that I'm posting this article from work...

but I'm sure you will find humour in that, which I hope will brighten your day. :)


November 18, 2007
Career Couch
Every Workday Needs a Game Plan
By PHYLLIS KORKKI
NY Times Link

Q. You just finished an eight-hour day at the office and, looking back, you barely got anything done. Now you feel guilty and worthless. What happened?

A. Rest assured that you are not alone. Heightened demands at work, combined with endless distractions and interruptions, are conspiring to make some workers feel scattered, confused and unsatisfied. In response, they are either shutting down and going on eBay, or spinning their wheels by doing busywork that is at most tangentially related to the core mission of their business.

Q. So a lack of productivity doesn’t mean that you’re lazy?

A. Most people do not want to be idle or inefficient at work; they want “productive, rewarding jobs where they feel they are making a difference,” said Mark Ellwood, president of Pace Productivity, a company based in Toronto that studies how employees spend their time.

People may blame themselves, or blame others, but a lack of productivity basically means that “you really didn’t have a strategy for attacking the day,” said Julie Morgenstern, a productivity consultant based in New York.

Q. You started the day with such good intentions. What prevented you from finishing any work?

A. Perfectionism, which leads to paralyzing fear and procrastination, are major culprits, both Mr. Ellwood and Ms. Morgenstern said.

The false promise of multitasking may also be leading workers astray, Ms. Morgenstern said. As much as employers may sing the praises of multitasking, research shows that it is not actually possible to perform more than one job at any given time.

Workers trying to talk on the phone, answer e-mail and complete a report at the same time will be unable to focus completely on any of those tasks. As a result, they will certainly look and feel busy, but at the end of the day they will have little to show for it.

It is better to have a sequential approach toward work, Ms. Morgenstern said, and that requires priorities and discipline.

Q. Can technology inhibit productivity?

A. A compulsion to surf the Internet and check e-mail stirs up a “desire to be in the know, to not be left out, that ends up taking up a lot of our time” — at the expense of getting things done, Mr. Ellwood said.

If he had his way, he would cut off Internet access — but not e-mail — for a vast majority of employees, and set up dedicated workstations for people to use when they really needed the Web for their work.

Companies, he maintains, “set the table” for employees to waste their time by making it so easy to distract themselves on their computers.

Q. Will making a to-do list help you get things done?

A. A realistic to-do list can help create a map for the day, and it is satisfying to make the check marks that indicate a task has been accomplished, Mr. Ellwood said.

But being realistic is crucial, because “when you are looking down the barrel of an endless to-do list, you freeze,” Ms. Morgenstern said.

“And then you start doing things like procrastinate, and doing the small easy tasks rather than the big important ones,” she added.

Q. What other steps can you take to be more productive?

A. Shockingly, Ms. Morgenstern advises against checking your e-mail when you arrive at the office. She has even written a book on productivity called “Never Check E-Mail in the Morning.” She calls e-mail “the world’s most convenient procrastination device.”

Instead, she said, use your first hour at work to concentrate on a high-priority task. That will help you begin the day with a clear head. Free of mental debris from the start, you set a good precedent for the rest of the day.

Mr. Ellwood advises clients to imagine that they have nothing to do the next day: no e-mail, no phone calls, no meetings, no specific plans. Then he asks: What can you do to accomplish a long-term goal you want to achieve one month from now? This forces people to disentangle themselves from busywork, he said, and to focus on what is really important to their business.

Ms. Morgenstern urges workers to end their day with a plan for the next day, and for the two days after that. This reduces the chances that they will be stuck in “reactive” mode — continually responding to calls, e-mail and in-person requests without an overarching plan of their own.

It is also important to accept that interruptions are a part of the day, and to assess realistically what percentage of your time will be spent dealing with them, as well as when they are most likely to occur, she said.

Q. You have so many things to do. How can you decide what is most important?

A. Give the highest priority to activities that either help generate revenue for your company or help it save money, Ms. Morgenstern said.

Once you have defined these activities, you can work on what she calls the four D’s: choosing which work you can delay, delete, delegate or diminish.

Winnowing out the peripheral tasks and homing in on the most important ones will help you gain control — and “once you feel you’re in control, you’re productive,” Ms. Morgenstern said.

E-mail: ccouch@nytimes.com.


I thought this was an interesting article, in particular the answer to the question: "Can technology inhibit productivity?" Perhaps because it strikes very close to home for me.

I was also surprised about the advice to not check your e-mail in the morning. Once I thought about it, I realized that it was bang-on about the advice and that there are many-a-morning that I get distracted from my initial plan when I check e-mail and get sucked into some other "concern".

Anyway, I guess a good plan would be to shut this browser down and focus on my tasks for the rest of the day.

Have a great day everyone!

g.

Monday, November 12, 2007

Lactic acid: not good... or is it?

Take a read of this and let me know what you think:

Lactic Acid

Finally, the old theories of aerobic training are crumbling under the weight of new evidence. At the center of the breakthrough is lactic acid. You’ve probably heard of it, especially if you’ve ever had a coach or a trainer. Conventional wisdom said you had to avoid lactic acid because its build up in your muscles caused pain, fatigue and the soreness you feel after “over doing it”.

We were told to exercise aerobically and not cross the dreaded lactic threshold. To do so would mean an-aerobic (without oxygen) exercise, which created the damaging lactic acid. That sparked the aerobics craze that reached its peak in the 1980’s.

But this theory never jived with my real world experience of the benefits of exceeding your aerobic threshold (which would build lots of the dreaded lactic acid.) It turns out lactic acid is not only not your enemy. To the contrary, it’s fuel for your muscles.

Dr. George Brooks from the University of California at Berkeley recently found that lactic acid is taken up and burned for energy by your mitochondria – the energy factories in your muscle cells.1 What’s more, it can not create the after workout soreness because it is rapidly removed as you burn it for fuel. In other words, it’s long gone before you get sore.

A high output, anaerobic workout is exactly what your body needs to increase your lungpower, build reserve capacity in your heart and melt away your fat stores.

To move your workout into the anaerobic range, the key feature I use is this: Create an “oxygen debt.” Simply exercise at a pace you can’t sustain as in a short sprint. Ask your lungs for more oxygen than they can provide. The difference between the oxygen you need and the oxygen you get is your oxygen debt. This will cause you to pant and continue to breathe hard even after you’ve stopped the sprint until you replace the oxygen you’re lacking.

Let’s say you pedal as fast as you can on a bike for 15 seconds. When you stop, you continue to pant. This is the kind of high-output challenge I’m talking about. You have reached a supra-aerobic zone. This is very different from doing an aerobic workout for 45 minutes.

Aerobic exercise is low to medium output held for an extended period. Anaerobic or supra-aerobic exercise is high output, but short in duration. Why is this important? For one thing, it restores an element of your native environment. Our ancestors lived in a world where our food fought back. Predators attached without notice. They had to run or fight – fast and hard. These short bursts of high-output activity fine tuned our ancient ancestors and kept them fit. We still have the same physiology.

This is the basis for my PACE® program. I began using most of this program 25 years ago. I’m delighted to see University-based science catching up to the idea. More recently, I added progressivity to increase the benefits.

By making small changes in the same direction, your workouts can produce remarkable results. And you only need 12 minutes to achieve the desired effect.

In a matter of weeks, you can:

Lose pounds of belly fat

* Build functional new muscle
* Reverse heart disease
* Build energy reserves available on demand
* Strengthen your immune system
* Reverse many of the changes of aging.

Very soon, you’ll be the first to get access to my entire PACE® program. It’s almost ready for release. I’m setting down out easy to follow, step-by-step instructions – with over 100 photos. It should give you everything you need to get started.

So stay tuned… I promise you’ll be the first to know.

To Your Good Health,

Al Sears, MD

1 Kolata G. Lactic Acid is Not Muscle’s Foe, It’s Fuel. The New York Times. May 16, 2006